Title
Influenza vaccination in the elderly.
Author
Morgan R; King D
Address
Geriatric Medicine, Withington Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Source
Postgrad Med J, 1996 Jun, 72:848, 339-42
Abstract
There is overwhelming evidence for the clinical efficacy of the influenza vaccine, especially in the elderly with chronic disease, reducing mortality and hospital admissions. There is also evidence to suggest that the influenza vaccine may be beneficial in the healthy elderly. There is some evidence to suggest that the antibody response in the elderly to the vaccine may decrease with increasing age, although there are several confounding factors that have not been taken into account in many of these studies. That aside, even if antibody response is not as good as that in younger people, the evidence that vaccination saves lives and reduces morbidity in the elderly means that the vaccination should be offered to elderly patients at high risk and perhaps even to the elderly healthy population. Although vaccination of an elderly at-risk patient does not necessarily mean that that particular patient will mount an appropriate antibody response, a significant number of elderly patients will respond appropriately. Serious side-effects from vaccination are extremely rare and the more common side-effects are mild and self-limiting. Increasing the number of elderly people receiving the influenza vaccination will not only result in cost savings for the National Health Service in terms of reduced hospitalisation but, more significantly, the elderly will benefit in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality.
Language of Publication
LA=ENG

Title
Increasing influenza vaccination rates for Medicare beneficiaries--Montana and Wyoming, 1994.
Author
Anonymous
Source
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 1995 Oct 13, 44:40, 744-6
Abstract
Approximately 20,000 influenza-associated deaths occurred during each of 10 different epidemics in the United States during 1972-1991; most (> 90%) of the deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza occurred among persons aged > or = 65 years. Although Medicare has provided reimbursement for influenza vaccination since 1993, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) received billing claims for influenza vaccination for the 1993-94 and 1994-95 influenza seasons for only 35% and 38% of Medicare beneficiaries, respectively (HCFA, unpublished data, 1995). This report describes the impact of an intervention project in September 1994 in which individual Medicare beneficiaries aged > or = 65 years in Montana and Wyoming were contacted and encouraged to receive influenza vaccination.
Language of Publication
LA=ENG

title
The effect of influenza vaccination on IL2 production in healthy elderly: implications for current vaccination practices.
Author
McElhaney JE; Meneilly GS; Beattie BL; Helgason CD; Lee SF; Devine RD; Bleackley RC
Address
University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Source
J Gerontol, 1992 Jan, 47:1, M3-8
Abstract
Age-related senescence of T-cell mediated responses is well recognized. This study was designed to determine how aging affects the T-cell mediated Interleukin 2 (IL2) response to influenza vaccination. A group of healthy elderly individuals were compared to a control group of healthy young adults for their response to the 1990 influenza vaccine. Cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were prepared from venous blood samples taken prevaccination (pre) and 8 and 12 weeks post-vaccination (post). PBMC cultures stimulated with inactivated A/Shanghai/16/89 (contained in the 1990 vaccine) and A/Philippine/2/82 (not contained in the vaccine) were assayed for peak IL2 activity. We find that after influenza vaccination, there was an insignificant increase in IL2 activity when PBMC from the young control group were stimulated with A/Shanghai/16/89 (pre, 5.14 U/mL/10(6) PBMC; post, 6.64 U/mL/10(6) PBMC) but there was a significant increase in IL2 activity when stimulated with A/Phillippine/2/82 (pre, 1.5 U/mL/10(6) PBMC; post, 8.3 U/mL/10(6) PBMC). In similar cultures of PBMC from the elderly group, there was a significant increase in IL2 response to both A/Shanghai/16/89 (pre, 1.6 U/mL/10(6) PBMC; post, 3.5 U/mL/10(6) PBMC) and A/Philippine/2/82 (pre, 0.86 U/mL/10(6) PBMC; post, 8.3 U/mL/10(6) PBMC). Measurements of CD4+/CD8+ populations were not affected by vaccination and were not significantly different in the two groups. Subgroup analysis of the elderly group revealed that previous influenza vaccination in 1989 did not significantly affect IL2 levels measured in the present study. This study shows that in healthy elderly, influenza vaccination effectively restores IL2 activity to normal. There appears to be an age-related decrease in the duration of T-cell memory.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Language of Publication
LA=ENG

Title
Parenteral influenza vaccination induces a rapid systemic and local immune response [see comments]
Author
Brokstad KA; Cox RJ; Olofsson J; Jonsson R; Haaheim LR
Address
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Gade Institute, University of Bergen, Norway.
Source
J Infect Dis, 1995 Jan, 171:1, 198-203
Abstract
The kinetics of the local immune response in the upper respiratory tract to parenterally administered inactivated split trivalent influenza vaccine were examined in 19 healthy subjects. Influenza virus-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASC) could be detected as early as 2 days after vaccination in peripheral blood and tonsils, with a peak at approximately 1 week after vaccination and a decline to insignificant levels after 6 weeks. Circulating ASC produced IgG, IgA, and IgM, whereas ASC in tonsils produced mainly IgA and IgM. Influenza virus-specific antibodies were predominantly IgG and IgM in serum and IgA in oral fluid; they rose after 1 week and were elevated at 6 weeks. This may indicate a secretory involvement of the anti-influenza virus response in the upper respiratory tract. Parenteral influenza vaccination induced an immediate and significant immune response in both the upper respiratory tract and peripheral blood.
Language of Publication
LA=ENG

Title
Factors affecting influenza vaccination among attendees at a senior center.
Author
Gianino CA; Corazzini K; Tseng WT; Richardson JP
Source
Md Med J, 1996 Jan, 45:1, 27-32
Abstract
Influenza is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. We questioned attendees at a Baltimore County senior center that offered influenza vaccination about the factors that influenced their decision to receive vaccination. Of the 43 responders, 37 (86%) stated they already had received vaccination in 1994 or were planning to be vaccinated. Vaccinated seniors were more likely than nonvaccinated seniors to believe that they were susceptible to influenza and they were more likely to have had influenza vaccination recommended to them by their physician. Vaccinated seniors also were more knowledgeable about the influenza vaccine. Physician recommendation appears to be an important factor in the decision by seniors to receive influenza vaccination.
Language of Publication
LA=ENG

Title
[Influenza vaccine in 85-and-over aged: motivation of elderly and family physicians to vaccinate or not]
Author
van Haaren KM; van den Brande KJ; Dekker FW; Ligthart GJ; Springer MP
Address
Vakgroep Huisartsgeneeskunde, Rijksuniversiteit, Leiden.
Source
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 1995 Oct 21, 139:42, 2144-8
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. To determine on what grounds persons over 85 years are or are not vaccinated against influenza. DESIGN. Descriptive. SETTING. Gerontological Research Centre and Department of General Practice Medicine, University of Leiden, the Netherlands. METHOD. A random sample (n = 331) of the general population of Leiden aged 85 years or older and not institutionalized were interviewed. Early in October 1993, 163 interviews were suitable for analysis (response rate 54%). An analysis of non-responders revealed no significant difference as regards gender and housing, but persons aged 90 and older were under-represented. The general practitioners (n = 41) of the 163 elderly persons were interviewed about these persons (response: n = 127; 78%) and about influenza vaccination in general (response: n = 33; 82%). RESULTS. The vaccination coverage rates were 51% according to the elderly and 56% according to the GPs; those of elderly people with an indication (48% according to themselves and 64% according to the GP) 52% and 67%, respectively. Reasons for elderly people not to accept vaccination were that they considered vaccination unnecessary, that they felt well and wanted to avoid possible adverse effects. A doctor's recommendation to have vaccination done was a positive influence. GPs' motives not to vaccinate were absence of an indication and the elderly person's wish. CONCLUSION. Only two-thirds of those over 85 not living in a nursing home with an indication for influenza vaccination were indeed vaccinated. Information about the possible damage done by influenza and about the pros and cons of vaccination, together with a doctor's advice to be vaccinated appeared to have a positive effect on the vaccination coverage.
Language of Publication
LA=DUT


予防接種を理解するために、へ戻る